Amex Travel vs mio travel: save places
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Amex TravelAmerican Express - Travel
mio travel: save placesmio travel - Travel| Metric | Amex Travel | mio travel: save places | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Amex Travel |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.88 | - | Amex Travel |
| Rating count | 26k | - | Amex Travel |
| Tracked keywords | 1 | 3 | mio travel: save places |
| Category | Travel | Travel | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Amex Travel and mio travel: save places are compared inside Travel with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Amex Travel leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for mio travel: save places in this pair. Amex Travel wins demand, Amex Travel has deeper review volume, and mio travel: save places has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.