AMap Global vs onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
AMap GlobalAutoNavi Information Technology Co. Ltd. - Navigation
onX Hunt: GPS Hunting MapsonXmaps, Inc. - Navigation| Metric | AMap Global | onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | AMap Global |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.74 | 4.89 | onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps |
| Rating count | 59k | 274k | onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps |
| Tracked keywords | 1 | — | AMap Global |
| Category | Navigation | Navigation | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
AMap Global and onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps are compared inside Navigation with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. AMap Global leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), AMap Global wins demand, onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps has deeper review volume, and AMap Global has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.