Airbnb vs 铁路12306
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
AirbnbAirbnb, Inc. - Travel
铁路12306中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司 - Travel| Metric | Airbnb | 铁路12306 | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | Not resolved | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | Not resolved | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | ~3.0M | $*** - opens with trial | Tie |
| Download band | 3.0M (point est.) | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.76 | - | Airbnb |
| Rating count | 702k | - | Airbnb |
| Tracked keywords | 2 | — | Airbnb |
| Category | Travel | Travel | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Airbnb and 铁路12306 are compared inside Travel with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Tie leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for 铁路12306 in this pair. Tie wins demand, Airbnb has deeper review volume, and Airbnb has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.