Adobe Scan: PDF & OCR Scanner vs Paycom
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Adobe Scan: PDF & OCR ScannerAdobe Inc. - Business
PaycomPaycom - Business| Metric | Adobe Scan: PDF & OCR Scanner | Paycom | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Paycom |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.88 | 4.77 | Adobe Scan: PDF & OCR Scanner |
| Rating count | 1.6M | 1.5M | Adobe Scan: PDF & OCR Scanner |
| Tracked keywords | 25 | — | Adobe Scan: PDF & OCR Scanner |
| Category | Business | Business | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Adobe Scan: PDF & OCR Scanner and Paycom are compared inside Business with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Paycom leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Adobe Scan: PDF & OCR Scanner in this pair. Paycom wins demand, Adobe Scan: PDF & OCR Scanner has deeper review volume, and Adobe Scan: PDF & OCR Scanner has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.