Acrobat Reader: PDF Editor vs iScanner: PDF Document Scanner
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Acrobat Reader: PDF EditorAdobe Inc. - Business
iScanner: PDF Document ScannerBPMobile - Business| Metric | Acrobat Reader: PDF Editor | iScanner: PDF Document Scanner | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Acrobat Reader: PDF Editor |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | iScanner: PDF Document Scanner |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.65 | 4.76 | iScanner: PDF Document Scanner |
| Rating count | 634k | 1.4M | iScanner: PDF Document Scanner |
| Tracked keywords | 20 | 16 | Acrobat Reader: PDF Editor |
| Category | Business | Business | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Acrobat Reader: PDF Editor and iScanner: PDF Document Scanner are compared inside Business with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. iScanner: PDF Document Scanner leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Acrobat Reader: PDF Editor wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), iScanner: PDF Document Scanner wins demand, iScanner: PDF Document Scanner has deeper review volume, and Acrobat Reader: PDF Editor has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.