0xCal: AI Calorie Counter vs Strava: Run, Bike, Walk
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
0xCal: AI Calorie CounterBartek Pichalski - Health & Fitness
Strava: Run, Bike, WalkStrava, Inc. - Health & Fitness| Metric | 0xCal: AI Calorie Counter | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~$16M | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $16M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~3.0M | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | 3.0M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.81 | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Rating count | - | 365k | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Tracked keywords | — | 6 | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
0xCal: AI Calorie Counter and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins demand, Strava: Run, Bike, Walk has deeper review volume, and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.