γ¬γζ₯ε vs Life360: Family Safety & GPS
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
γ¬γζ₯εTakumi Shin - Social Networking
Life360: Family Safety & GPSLife360 - Social Networking| Metric | γ¬γζ₯ε | Life360: Family Safety & GPS | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~$19M | Life360: Family Safety & GPS |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $19M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~2.0M | Life360: Family Safety & GPS |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | 2.0M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.79 | Life360: Family Safety & GPS |
| Rating count | - | 3.0M | Life360: Family Safety & GPS |
| Tracked keywords | β | 2 | Life360: Family Safety & GPS |
| Category | Social Networking | Social Networking | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
γ¬γζ₯ε and Life360: Family Safety & GPS are compared inside Social Networking with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Life360: Family Safety & GPS leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Life360: Family Safety & GPS wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Life360: Family Safety & GPS wins demand, Life360: Family Safety & GPS has deeper review volume, and Life360: Family Safety & GPS has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.