γγγγγγ vs PictureThis - Plant Identifier
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
γγγγγγEnuma, Inc. - Education
PictureThis - Plant IdentifierGlority Global Group Ltd. - Education| Metric | γγγγγγ | PictureThis - Plant Identifier | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | PictureThis - Plant Identifier |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | PictureThis - Plant Identifier |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.81 | PictureThis - Plant Identifier |
| Rating count | - | 1.1M | PictureThis - Plant Identifier |
| Tracked keywords | β | 2 | PictureThis - Plant Identifier |
| Category | Education | Education | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
γγγγγγ and PictureThis - Plant Identifier are compared inside Education with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. PictureThis - Plant Identifier leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and PictureThis - Plant Identifier wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), PictureThis - Plant Identifier wins demand, PictureThis - Plant Identifier has deeper review volume, and PictureThis - Plant Identifier has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.