百度网盘 vs Microsoft Word
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
百度网盘Beijing Duyou Science and Technology Co.,Ltd. - Productivity
Microsoft WordMicrosoft Corporation - Productivity| Metric | 百度网盘 | Microsoft Word | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | 百度网盘 |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Tie |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.73 | Microsoft Word |
| Rating count | - | 2.9M | Microsoft Word |
| Tracked keywords | — | 15 | Microsoft Word |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
百度网盘 and Microsoft Word are compared inside Productivity with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Tie leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and 百度网盘 wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Tie wins demand, Microsoft Word has deeper review volume, and Microsoft Word has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.