中国农业银行 vs Military Retirement
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
中国农业银行中国农业银行 - Finance
Military RetirementLYNNFIELD LLC - Finance| Metric | 中国农业银行 | Military Retirement | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | 中国农业银行 |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.85 | Military Retirement |
| Rating count | - | 13k | Military Retirement |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Finance | Finance | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
中国农业银行 and Military Retirement are compared inside Finance with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. 中国农业银行 leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Military Retirement in this pair. 中国农业银行 wins demand, Military Retirement has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.