百度地图-路线规划,出行必备 vs MilGPS
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
百度地图-路线规划,出行必备Beijing Baidu Netcom Science & Technology Co.,Ltd - Navigation
MilGPSCascode Labs Pty Ltd - Navigation| Metric | 百度地图-路线规划,出行必备 | MilGPS | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | MilGPS |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | 百度地图-路线规划,出行必备 |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.72 | 4.83 | MilGPS |
| Rating count | 43k | 5.5k | 百度地图-路线规划,出行必备 |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Navigation | Navigation | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
百度地图-路线规划,出行必备 and MilGPS are compared inside Navigation with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. 百度地图-路线规划,出行必备 leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and MilGPS wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), 百度地图-路线规划,出行必备 wins demand, 百度地图-路线规划,出行必备 has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.