世界の路線図・オフライン対応 vs Uber - Request a ride
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
世界の路線図・オフライン対応Urban-Map - Travel
Uber - Request a rideUber Technologies, Inc. - Travel| Metric | 世界の路線図・オフライン対応 | Uber - Request a ride | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | Not resolved | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | Not resolved | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~5.0M | Uber - Request a ride |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | 5.0M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.90 | Uber - Request a ride |
| Rating count | - | 16.5M | Uber - Request a ride |
| Tracked keywords | 1 | — | 世界の路線図・オフライン対応 |
| Category | Travel | Travel | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
世界の路線図・オフライン対応 and Uber - Request a ride are compared inside Travel with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Uber - Request a ride leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for 世界の路線図・オフライン対応 in this pair. Uber - Request a ride wins demand, Uber - Request a ride has deeper review volume, and 世界の路線図・オフライン対応 has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.